A Name Read Aloud First

Like so many entries in this book, it opens with a pronunciation lesson: البركة — “بالضم” — with dammah on the bā'. In Arabic, a single vowel can turn one word into a completely different thing (and we will see that again before this short entry is done), so the book reads the name aloud for you before it says anything about the bird.

Then the definition, exactly one line: طائر من طيور الماء — “a water bird.” The plural is burak (برك). That is the whole natural history we get. No colors, no sizes, no habits. Medieval compilers were honest about how little they sometimes had.

“Of the Birds of the Evening”

The one scientific note comes from Ibn Sida, the great lexicographer of al-Muhkam: البركة من طير المساء — “al-barkah is of the birds of the evening.”

Stop and think about what that phrase is doing. A thousand years ago, a scholar sat down and grouped birds by when they are active — evening birds, morning birds — an ecological observation dressed as a dictionary note. The book gives the plurals too: burak, abrāk (أبراك), barakān (بركان). Al-Damiri adds his own grammatical touch: the last two, he says, are جمع الجمع — “plurals of the plural,” one step further down the chain. Language nerds, he never forgot you.

The Verse That Saved It from Obscurity

Here is the part that makes this entry worth reading. Zuhayr — Zuhayr ibn Abi Sulma, the pre-Islamic master of the Mu'allaqat — once described a sandgrouse (qatāh) fleeing from a falcon to water running open on the earth's surface:

حتى استغاثت بماء لا رشاء له ... بين الأباطح في حافاته البرك

“Until it sought refuge in water with no well-rope — among the pebble plains, the burak on its edges.”

No well-rope means no well: this is open surface water, a stream spread over the desert floor. A hunted bird, exhausted, drops from the sky to the water — and there, on the banks, stand the burak: the water birds, watching, waiting, unbothered. It is a chase scene frozen in four Arabic words, older than the book itself by centuries, and al-Damiri quotes it the way a naturalist might quote a field guide. Poetry was his field guide.

I keep coming back to the word الأباطح — the pebble-strewn plains. You can feel the desert heat coming off that line. A book about animals written in a world without cameras preserved its images in verse, and this is one of the sharpest.

Bird or Frog? The Reading That Changes the Picture

Then the twist. The entry says: والبركة أيضا الضفدع — “al-barkah also means the frog.” And some scholars, the book tells us, explained Zuhayr's verse that way — “في حافاته البرك” as frogs, not birds, lining the water's edges.

Picture the difference. Same verse, same desert water, same chase. In one reading, the banks are edged with elegant water birds. In the other, with frogs. The sandgrouse does not care either way — it just needs the water — but the medieval commentators genuinely argued about it, and the book reports the disagreement honestly instead of picking a side. I love that. A thousand years before footnotes had arguments with each other, they already did.

The Camel Connection

The entry's last line is a different word hiding under the same root: والبرك — al-burk — “a group of kneeling camels,” the singular bārik and the feminine bārikah, quoted from al-'Ubab. The root b-r-k is about settling, kneeling down, resting. Water birds settle on the water's edge. Frogs settle on the banks. Camels kneel and settle in the dust. Three animals, one root, one idea: the act of coming to rest. Arabic packs poetry into its grammar the way its poets packed deserts into their lines.

The Ledger

The strict ledger, because this series does not invent: (1) البركة is read with dammah on the bā' and is a water bird, plural burak; (2) Ibn Sida classed it among طير المساء, “the birds of the evening,” with plurals abrāk and barakān; (3) Zuhayr's verse shows a sandgrouse fleeing a falcon to open running water, “the burak on its edges”; (4) al-barkah also means the frog, and some read Zuhayr's line that way; (5) al-burk is a group of kneeling camels, per al-'Ubab. Every fact here comes from those lines — and from nothing else.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is al-barkah?

    Al-barkah (البركة), read with dammah on the bā', is a water bird in Hayat al-Hayawan, plural burak. The entry is short — one definition line, a pronunciation note, Ibn Sida's classification of it as an “evening bird,” a verse by the pre-Islamic poet Zuhayr showing water birds at a desert water's edge, and the note that the word also means the frog.

  2. Why do scholars disagree about Zuhayr's verse?

    Because البركة means both “water bird” and “frog.” Zuhayr's line “في حافاته البرك” — “the burak on its edges” — describes the banks of the open water where a fleeing sandgrouse lands. Read one way, the edges are lined with water birds; read the other, with frogs. The book reports both readings without choosing.

  3. What is al-burk, and what does it have to do with camels?

    Al-burk (البرك) is a different word on the same b-r-k root: a group of kneeling camels (singular bārik, feminine bārikah), quoted from al-'Ubab. The root carries the idea of settling down — water birds settling at the water's edge, frogs settling on the banks, camels kneeling to rest. Same root, same motion, three animals.

Source: Al-Damiri, Hayat al-Hayawan al-Kubra, the barkah (البركة) entry — shamela.ws/book/10664/178. Medieval beliefs are presented as historical curiosities, not facts.